Trump Tried to Create a Plan to Invade Greenland. Generals Reportedly Stopped Him.

This is not a drill.

Donald Trump just gave an unlawful order. And this time, the military didn’t comply.

According to new reporting, Trump ordered US special forces commanders to begin drawing up plans to invade Greenland. Not negotiate. Not expand basing agreements. Not coordinate with allies. Invade. Senior military officials immediately pushed back, warning that such an order would be illegal and would never receive congressional approval. That resistance may be the only thing standing between the United States and a catastrophic foreign policy disaster right now.

What makes this moment especially disturbing is that it didn’t come out of nowhere. For months, the Trump administration and its allies have been laying the groundwork to erase a basic principle of American military law: that service members are not required to follow unlawful orders. When Democratic lawmakers reminded troops of that fact, they were attacked and accused of undermining the military. At the same time, Trump’s inner circle was doing something very intentional. They were conditioning the public and the ranks to believe that there is no such thing as an unlawful order when it comes from the president.

Pete Hegseth spent months insisting that questioning orders was dangerous and unpatriotic. JD Vance openly called the War Powers Act fake and unconstitutional, arguing that presidents should be able to launch wars without congressional approval. That rhetoric wasn’t academic. It was preparation. And now we’re seeing exactly what they were preparing for.

After the administration convinced itself that its operation to capture Venezuela’s leader was a success, Trump’s advisers reportedly became emboldened. The thinking appears to be simple: move fast, act aggressively, and seize territory before anyone can stop you. Greenland suddenly became the next target. Katie Miller posting “soon” alongside an image of Greenland draped in an American flag wasn’t subtle. It was a signal.

Trump himself has now said the quiet part out loud. He stated that the United States would do something with Greenland whether they like it or not. That phrasing is revealing. It shows how he understands power. Consent is irrelevant. Sovereignty is optional. Smaller nations exist to be taken if they can’t resist.

The justification he’s using doesn’t hold up to even basic scrutiny. Trump claims that the US must act before Russia or China “takes over” Greenland. That is not how reality works. Greenland is part of Denmark. Denmark is a NATO member. Any invasion would immediately trigger Article 5. The United States already has troops stationed in Greenland with full cooperation from our allies. There is no emergency, no vacuum, and no credible threat requiring an invasion.

So why float something this reckless?

Multiple diplomats believe Trump is trying to distract from a failing domestic agenda and a weakening economy ahead of the midterms. Republicans are divided, congressional control is slipping, and Trump is edging closer to becoming a lame duck. When his power at home erodes, he lashes out abroad. We’ve seen this pattern before. He sues the media. He militarizes blue cities. He escalates overseas. Chaos becomes a substitute for competence.

One of the most chilling details in the reporting is what happened when military leaders resisted the Greenland plan. According to sources, they attempted to distract Trump by proposing less controversial alternatives, including intercepting Russian ghost ships or even launching a strike on Iran. Let that sink in. The invasion of Greenland wasn’t treated as unthinkable. It was treated as one option among several. The only reason it didn’t move forward is because senior officials refused to carry out an illegal order.

That should alarm everyone.

European allies are now openly discussing worst-case scenarios where Trump’s actions fracture NATO from the inside. Some officials believe this may be the point. If Trump can’t legally withdraw from NATO, provoking a crisis that forces allies to abandon it achieves the same result. Occupying Greenland could do exactly that. Start with threats, escalate fear, then demand concessions. That isn’t diplomacy. It’s coercion.

This story isn’t really about Greenland. It’s about whether the rule of law still applies to the president of the United States. It’s about whether the military remains loyal to the Constitution rather than a single man. And it’s about how close we are to watching a sitting president try to manufacture a war to save himself politically.

This time, the military said no.

We may not get that chance again.

If you appreciate pieces like this, consider becoming a paid subscriber. This gets published ad-free so everyone has access to information, which is made possible thanks to subscribers like you.